『徳島大学 教育・研究者情報データベース (EDB)』---[学外] /
ID: Pass:

登録内容 (EID=180418)

EID=180418EID:180418, Map:0, LastModified:2014年11月19日(水) 12:04:48, Operator:[任 福継], Avail:TRUE, Censor:0, Owner:[任 福継], Read:継承, Write:継承, Delete:継承.
種別 (必須): 国際会議 [継承]
言語 (必須): 英語 [継承]
招待 (推奨):
審査 (推奨): Peer Review [継承]
カテゴリ (推奨): 研究 [継承]
共著種別 (推奨):
学究種別 (推奨):
組織 (推奨): 1.徳島大学.大学院ソシオテクノサイエンス研究部.情報ソリューション部門.感性情報処理 (2006年4月1日〜2016年3月31日) [継承]
著者 (必須): 1. (英) Mi Liping (日) (読)
役割 (任意):
貢献度 (任意):
学籍番号 (推奨):
[継承]
2. (英) Luo Xin (日) (読)
役割 (任意):
貢献度 (任意):
学籍番号 (推奨):
[継承]
3.任 福継 ([徳島大学.大学院社会産業理工学研究部.理工学域.知能情報系.情報工学分野]/[徳島大学.理工学部.理工学科.情報光システムコース.情報工学講座]/->個人[中川 福継])
役割 (任意):
貢献度 (任意):
学籍番号 (推奨):
[継承]
題名 (必須): (英) AN ERP RESEARCH ON CHINESE JAPANESE LEARNERS' PROCESSING OF JAPANESE KANJI AND SENTENCES  (日)    [継承]
副題 (任意):
要約 (任意): (英) This paper aims to investigate the recognition process ofJapanese Kanji and sentences for Chinese Japanese learners(CJL) by analyzing the event-related potential (ERP)differences between CJL and JNS (Japanese nativespeakers) while they visually recognized Japanese Kanjiand sentences. The experiment results showed that nosignificant differences were found between the two groupsin the Japanese Kanji condition, but the differences werefound in the Japanese sentences conditions. The N400latency for JNS appeared earlier, and the amplitude wasbigger than CJL, but the duration for CJL was longer thanthat for JNS. These results demonstrated that the difficultydegree for CJL was bigger than that for JNS on thesemantic processing of Japanese sentences. The P600appeared broadly following the N400 component for JNS,in contrast, the P600 only appeared over the right frontallobe for CJL. This demonstrated that the neuralmechanisms of recognition process of Japanese sentencesbetween the two groups were not identical. JNS alsoperformed syntactic processing after completed semanticprocessing. From the results, for CJL, the difficulty ofJapanese language learning was the recognition andunderstanding of Japanese sentences which includinghiragara, not Japanese Kanji.  (日)    [継承]
キーワード (推奨):
発行所 (推奨): IEEE [継承]
誌名 (必須): (英) ICAI 2008 (日) (読)
ISSN (任意):
[継承]
(必須): [継承]
(必須): [継承]
(必須): 14 19 [継承]
都市 (必須): 北京 (Beijing/[中華人民共和国]) [継承]
年月日 (必須): 西暦 2008年 10月 20日 (平成 20年 10月 20日) [継承]
URL (任意):
DOI (任意):
PMID (任意):
NAID (任意):
WOS (任意):
Scopus (任意):
評価値 (任意):
被引用数 (任意):
指導教員 (推奨):
備考 (任意):

標準的な表示

和文冊子 ● Liping Mi, Xin Luo and Fuji Ren : AN ERP RESEARCH ON CHINESE JAPANESE LEARNERS' PROCESSING OF JAPANESE KANJI AND SENTENCES, ICAI 2008, 14-19, Beijing, Oct. 2008.
欧文冊子 ● Liping Mi, Xin Luo and Fuji Ren : AN ERP RESEARCH ON CHINESE JAPANESE LEARNERS' PROCESSING OF JAPANESE KANJI AND SENTENCES, ICAI 2008, 14-19, Beijing, Oct. 2008.

関連情報

Number of session users = 3, LA = 0.48, Max(EID) = 383966, Max(EOID) = 1027057.