徳島大学 教育・研究者情報データベース(EDB)

1. (日) 原田 雪子

   役割	任意
   貢献度	任意
   学籍番号	推奨

2. (日) 石田 弓

   役割	任意
   貢献度	任意
   学籍番号	推奨

3. 内海 千種([徳島大学.大学院社会産業理工学研究部.社会総合科学域.人間科学系.心理学分野]/[徳島大学.総合科学部.社会総合科学科.心身健康コース])

   役割	任意
   貢献度	任意
   学籍番号	推奨

(日) 心理面接における動的家族画・家族イメージ法の活用-課題の非構造的・半構造的特徴に注目して-

(日) In this paper，to clarify the use of Kinetic Family Drawings (KFD) andFamily Image Test (FIT) in the psychotherapy，family's characteristics thatboth techniques were made to notice were examined by focusing on thedifference of the stimulation structure. As a result，there is no difference inthe matter noticed about "family members' characteristics","relations offamily members"，and "episodes concerning a family" as for KFD and FIT.Therefore，it has been understood to be able to notice these matters even byeach technique in the psychotherapy. It is easy for FIT with half structuralstimulus to notice specific family feature. It is easy for KFD withnon-structural stimulus to notice about various matters of the family fromthe past to the future.Moreover，the difference of feature of the family interpreted by KFD andFIT was clarified，and the possibility as the test battery was examined. As aresult，it is easy for KFD with non-structural stimulus to understandconcrete family feature in various situations. On the other hand，it wasclarified that family's basic characteristic was understood by FIT with halfstructural stimulus. Therefore，the method for the commentary use of bothtechniques was suggested. For instance， FIT can be effectively used tounderstand family's basic characteristic， and KFD is more effective tounderstand a detailed feature and the originality of the family.

1. (日) 動的家族画
2. (日) 家族イメージ法
3. (日) 心理面接
4. (日) 家族力動
5. (日) 家族システム